”He presented himself as a responsible person”- Ogun monarch speaks on why he bestowed chieftaincy title on singer Portable

The Onitigbo of Tigbo-Ilu Land, in Ota, Ado-Odo/Ota Local Government Area of Ogun State, Olabode Thomas-Fagbayi, has justified why he conferred a chieftaincy title on the controversial singer, Habeeb Okikiola popularly known as Portable.

On Monday, August 22, Portable took to his social media handles to announce his new title as the Amuludun of Tigbo Awori land.

He shared photos of himself at the ceremony where he was decorated with the chieftaincy title.

Shortly after posting the photos, some Nigerians accused the monarch of collecting bribe to bestow the honor on Portable who they said was unbefitting of any title.

However, in a chat with Premiumtimes, the monarch said he never knew the famous artist until recently and that he bestowed the title on him because he is respectful.

“I visited a school in my domain where I have gotten a report of misbehaviour among the pupils and students of the school.

So, I went to the school to talk briefly with them. It was there that I was told that somebody called Portable was passing through my domain and was throwing money at people, and in the process, many got injured.

Because of that, I summoned him to my palace, and he came twice, but I wasn’t at the palace when he came. So, one day, I was walking on the road, and I saw him driving; I called for him, and he immediately came with his boys, and they all prostrated on the road.”he said

The monarch also mentioned that the singer has his roots in Tigbo town and is well behaved. “His mum is from Tigbo, and he too lives here; he presented himself as a responsible person, and we take him as that.

Some people might have reservations about him, but even at that, he is our son.”he said The monarch added that the singer had also shown readiness to be part of the celebration of ‘Tigbo day’.

Mr Thomas-Fagbayi, however, debunked social media claims that he was paid to honor the famous artist and insisted that he is a monarch whom “God has blessed.”

Police invite Kizz Daniel for questioning after he allegedly confiscated a dry cleaner’s bus for damaging his clothes worth N14 million

The police in Lagos state have invited singer Oluwatobiloba Daniel Anidugbe aka Kizz Daniel for questioning.

According to a source who confirmed this to LIB, the ”Buga” crooner was invited for questioning for allegedly confiscating the laundry bus of a company he contracted to do laundry for him.

The singer reportedly seized the bus on grounds that the N14 million worth of clothes he gave them to clean were damaged. The owners of the laundry bus reported the matter to men of the Ilasan police division who immediately invited him for questioning.

The singer’s lawyer contacted the police today August 5 and said that he will be available for questioning on Tuesday, August 9.

The laundry bus has been recovered.

Portable Zazu forgives fan who smashed his car window and also gives him money.

Nigerian upcoming singer Portable recently shared a video of a fan who smashed his car glass, as he ended up forgiving him Portable in the video at first threatened to take the fan to the police station but changed his mind as he allowed him to go freely The Zazu singer was also seen in the video giving the fan money, an action which stirred reactions from his fans.

Hours after he tendered an apology to the organisers of the Headies Awards, Nigerian upcoming singer Portable Zazu shared a video of a fan who smashed his car glass. The video showed Portable threatening to take the fan to the police station for his action; however, after apologising, the singer forgave him and asked him to get down from his car.

Portable seems to be using the video to send an indirect message to the Headies to forgive him, not minding what he has done in the past.

Taylor Swift sexual assault verdict discussed at Supreme Court.

During Supreme Court oral arguments Tuesday in a dispute over campus speech rights, justices cited a 2017 jury verdict that awarded pop star Taylor Swift’s demand to be paid $1 by a man who was found liable for groping her.

The reference to Swift’s sexual assault case arose as the court wrestled with the legal significance of a college student’s request for a minuscule payout from his college for allegedly violating his First Amendment rights. 

Both Swift and the college student, Chike Uzuegbunam, demanded only pittances from defendants in their disputes – a legal concept known as “nominal damages.” At issue in the student’s case is whether his lawsuit should survive in light of both his college having lifted its offending speech restrictions, and the small amount of money requested. 

Justice Elena Kagan called Swift’s case “the most famous nominal damages case I know of in recent times.”

Addressing a lawyer for Georgia Gwinnett College, Kagan suggested the $1 that the pop singer demanded, while small in financial terms, carried potent symbolic value – and asked if the same principle applied in Uzuegbunam’s case.

“A few years ago, [Swift] brought a suit against a radio host for sexually assaulting her, and she said, I’m not really interested in your money, I just want $1. And that dollar is going to represent something both to me and to the world of women who have experienced what I’ve experienced,” Kagan said.

“That’s what happened: The jury gave her $1,” she continued. “And it was an unquestionable physical harm. But she just asked for this $1 to say that she had been harmed. Why not?”

Georgia’s Solicitor General Andrew Pinson, who argued the case for the state college, told the justices that the student’s nominal damages claim is not legally significant enough to keep the case alive after the school relaxed its speech policy. In effect, the school argued, Uzuegbunam no longer has the kind of injury that must be present for a court to step in.

The Department of Justice argued on the student’s behalf Tuesday, telling the justices that the small amount of money Uzuegbunam is seeking should not disqualify his legal challenge.

Uzuegbunam brought his suit against Georgia Gwinnett College after school officials in 2016 repeatedly ordered him to refrain from professing his Christian faith on campus grounds, claiming that he had failed to comply in various ways with the school’s particularly harsh speech code.

After the lawsuit was filed, the school relaxed its policy in 2017 and asked the district court judge to dismiss the case as moot, which it granted. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit affirmed the lower court ruling, prompting Uzuegbunam’s appeal to the Supreme Court.

A decision in the case, Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski, is expected by late June.

Exit mobile version